Westcountry Land

Latest News


March 13, 2017

Belle Hill plans for 96 new homes receives "Conditional Support"

Kingsbridge Town Council’s planning committee has recommended ‘conditional support’ for the development of 96 new homes to the west of Belle Hill.

The committee meeting on Tuesday evening was attended by representatives of the developers Westcountry Land along with about 20 members of the public, many of whom will be directly affected by the development and are keen to voice concerns.

The committee ultimately recommended five conditions necessary for their support. Firstly, they requested an air and noise pollution survey analysing the impact of traffic on the area and particularly Church Street. Some of the most vehement opposition to the development has been from residents who stand to be impacted by an increase in traffic on Church Street.

Several members of the public disputed Devon County Council’s highway consultation, written by case officer Richard Jackson. The report predicts that the new development will see 23 vehicles leaving to the north, five vehicles leaving to the south and eight vehicles entering the site between 8am and 9am. And 10 vehicles leaving to the north, seven vehicles leaving to the south and 19 vehicles entering the site between 4pm and 5pm.

Mr Pengelly of Buckwell Road asked: “Where did they get this analysis from? It’s a joke - I live close to Belle Hill and 99 per cent of the time I turn right!”

Ian Lawrence, who also lives on Belle Hill drew attention to the potential increase in traffic numbers and the dangerous intersection near the primary school at the bottom of Belle Cross Road as a cause for concern.

Mr Lawrence made two requests of the committee - one was that the veracity of Westcountry Land’s consultation traffic count (conducted by Vectos) be questioned and compared with the one conducted by Church Street residents in October.

Residents of Church Street conducted a traffic survey that found 2,120 vehicles travelled down Church Street over a five hour period in October. Traffic was counted between 7am and 9.30am and again from 2.50pm until 5.15pm. One resident highlighted that with two parking spaces for each of the 96 homes, there could be an increase of 192 cars daily, with up to 384 journeys in and out of the development.

Mr Lawrence asked the committee: “Would Mr Jackson have a clear conscience if there’s another serious accident? I do hope you pay balance to the pleasantness of Kingsbridge with the need for development, and that you do not let the town get too congested.”

David Lavender from Church Street drew attention to a petition, signed by 50 residents of Church Street, against the development on Belle Hill.

Mr Lavender is particularly concerned at the current level of car emissions on Church Street - and the potential increase this development would cause.

He drew attention to a recent World Health Organisation report which drew attention to air pollution as a greater threat than ebola or HIV. And also a study published in the Lancet that showed that living near heavy traffic increases the risk of dementia.

Mr Lawrence said: “You, as a committee, cannot approve this application unless there is a way to divert the traffic away from Church Street.”

The second condition called for by the committee is for section 106 highways money to be used to improve safety on Church Street, for example the installation of a safer crossing at the junction with Belle Vue Road or a lollipop person being reinstated for school children.

Several residents raised concerns for road safety, particularly on Church Street. Jean Anderson of Church Street called on the committee to consider the children. Particularly those who walk to and from the primary school every day immersed in car fumes. She highlighted the dangerous crossing at the intersection of Church Street and Wallingford Road - a crossing once manned by a lollipop lady during the school run - but recently cut by Devon County Council. She also noted the dangers of children crossing to enter and exit Duncombe Park.

“The fumes are horrendous - I no longer hang my washing on the line because of them,” Jean added.

Margaret Halliday, also of Church Street said: “I don’t see how we can cope. There’s often a traffic jam outside of my house, and in the holiday season it’s appalling.”

Justin Dodge, director of Westcountry Land addressed concerns about the traffic levels on Church Street. He explained that impact of this development won’t cause a “significant increase, because there’s an existing problem”- and explained the survey conducted by Vectos, on behalf of Westcountry Land, was conducted in August because this “represents the highest levels of traffic in Kingsbridge” - an opinion disputed by murmurings in the public gallery.

The committee’s third condition was to meet with the applicant’s landscape architect to discuss landscaping on the site. One member of the public described the design as “most inconsiderate”, and described the impact it will have on the access to Buckwell Close as “disgraceful”.

“These three-storey houses will be visible on the skyline of Kingsbridge and the LED street lights will appear to be in the sky to those living below the site,” he added.

The fourth condition of the committee was that the £300 sustainable travel vouchers - planned to be offered to every new home - should be invested in a bus service taking residents form the development into the town so as to ease congestion in the town.

The fifth condition of the committee’s support was that reassurance of the impact on the town’s drainage, both the surface water drains and the potential for flooding, as well as South West Water’s plans for sewage in the town.

Barry Day from Wallingford Road raised concerns with the plans for attenuation tanks, and theIR potential to create greater risk of flooding if not maintained, for example if leaves weren’t cleaned out in the autumn. He also highlighted that the plans for the tanks to drain into the stream at the bottom of Duncombe Street is flawed, as the stream has flooded in the past.

One issue that arose several times throughout the meeting was the fear that the developer would challenge the section 106 money and particularly, the agreement for 30 per cent affordable homes through a ‘viability report’ after permission had been granted.

Cllr Griffin said: “Our local development plan states that any development should have a minimum of 30 per cent affordable homes. You’re not too blame for the sins of your kind. But are you making a firm commitment to 30 per cent affordable homes and is the layout and content of the section 106 agreement fixed?”

Mr Dodge assured the committee and public that the section 106 agreement would be honoured.

Mr Dodge said: “These figures have been agreed in advance and are honourable. Unlike other planning applications, the section 106 money is bound in the application.”

“I think that if a site cannot deliver a certain level of affordable homes, it should be left as a green field,” Mr Dodge added.

The decision is expected to be ratified at next week’s Kingsbridge Town Council meeting in the Council Chamber at Quay House, at 7pm on Tuesday, March 14.

The application can be seen and commented on the South Hams District Council planning website, using the reference number 0299/17/OPA.

Posted on: March 13, 2017

Tile October 30, 2018 Concerns over Fowey housing development on greenfield site Tile October 29, 2018 New homes approved for Fowey despite concerns Tile October 29, 2018 Homes plan next to A30 approved despite noise concerns for poorest residents Tile October 23, 2018 Falmouth Rugby Club plans at Menehay Fields refused on appeal Tile July 16, 2018 Homes refused planning permission at Truro even though locals didn't care Tile June 19, 2018 Mevagissey votes for ban on second homes to stave off ‘ghost village’ Tile May 24, 2018 Plan for 46 Homes Tile December 04, 2017 Falmouth Rugby Club's plans for Menehay Fields have gone to appeal Tile October 25, 2017 Councillors approve yet more homes for Exminster Tile April 23, 2017 Judicial review against Council says Councillor benefited from decision he helped make Tile March 13, 2017 Belle Hill plans for 96 new homes receives "Conditional Support" Tile November 01, 2016 Council will not support Falmouth Rugby Club plans for Menehay housing Tile October 14, 2016 226 homes will enable Falmouth Rugby Club to upgrade its facilities Tile October 11, 2016 Developer says majority of residents support 226 homes on Menehay fields Tile August 11, 2016 Midas wins appeal for 94 homes near Budock Church Tile June 10, 2016 Falmouth School’s State of the art sports facilities plan approved Tile June 09, 2016 Menehay housing scheme would secure Falmouth Rugby Club’s future Tile June 08, 2016 Development would secure club’s future Tile May 02, 2016 Union Corner housing plans win the support of Falmouth councillors Tile February 25, 2016 Proposals for new Falmouth School sports facilities and Union Corner housing opposed Tile January 28, 2016 Union Corner housing proposals get positive response from planning officer Tile November 19, 2015 Public consultation planned for Union Corner housing scheme Tile August 28, 2015 St Austell and Newquay MP Steve Double hails “momentous” Trewhiddle Farm planning decision Tile August 28, 2015 Potential windfall for Falmouth club after proposed development but residents fear further projects Tile June 03, 2015 Mevagissey development set to be approved Tile May 26, 2015 224 new homes planned for outskirts of Exeter Tile March 31, 2015 Plans for 42 homes in Mawnan Smith approved at appeal Tile February 05, 2015 St Austell town council votes unanimously to back Higher Trewhiddle Farm plans Tile January 30, 2015 Developer in 12 homes plan Tile December 30, 2014 Council’s bill rises as developers win more planning appeals Tile August 27, 2014 Is plan for 47,500 homes in Cornwall a countryside invasion or a solution to housing crisis? Tile August 14, 2014 Housing scheme on the outskirts of St Just in Roseland thrown out Tile February 26, 2014 Delight and dismay as Mawnan homes rejected Tile December 13, 2013 Businesses to reveal retail site alternative Tile December 05, 2013 High Court halts 31-homes plan Tile October 24, 2013 Plans for 42 new homes in Mawnan Smith refused by Cornwall Council Tile September 21, 2013 Plans for 42 homes at Mawnan draws dozens of objections Tile June 25, 2013 Plans submitted for 42 home development in Mawnan Smith Tile April 25, 2013 Westcountry Land gets go-ahead for new equestrian centre Tile February 26, 2013 Developer’s £470,000 for village school and crossing Tile February 15, 2013 Final approval for affordable homes at Mevagissey Tile February 15, 2013 Planners agree to 90 new homes for Cornish village Mabe Tile January 17, 2013 Let us build houses to help stop Fal pollution – Luxury Homes preferable to ongoing oil leak into river, says company Tile December 03, 2012 New £100m plan for homes and shopping complex Tile November 28, 2012 Controversial homes plan in Mevagissey gets go-ahead Tile November 19, 2012 New affordable homes for Cornish villagers Tile November 09, 2012 Homes challenge being considered Tile August 02, 2012 Villagers seek more say over Homes plan Tile July 13, 2012 Developers defend affordable housing Tile May 30, 2012 31 homes are planned for port beauty spot Tile March 15, 2012 Views sought on Mabe housing plan Tile February 29, 2012 Local opinion split over housing plans Tile February 22, 2012 Group to fight plan for homes on green fields Tile February 22, 2012 Plans unveiled for Mevagissey development Tile November 28, 2011 Homes bid for Mabe Tile November 17, 2011 Plan includes new affordable housing

Project Map

Completed Completed       Live Live
Menu button Logo
Truro: 01872 248758 / Plymouth: 01752 967616